Wings on their heels, by @steevc

You may well have read about the latest sensations in the #running world which are the latest shoes from Nike that promise measurable improvements in times, several percent in some cases. They have already been used to break the marathon records. These shoes combine new types of foam with carbon fibre spring plates to recover more energy from each pace in some radical looking shoes. Technology has long played a part in making people run faster, but when one manufacturer gives such a large advantage it can reduce the important human aspect of the sport. World Athletics has set some new rules on the thickness of soles and limited them to a single spring plate. Shoes used in competition must be available for all to buy. Rival companies will try to come up with their own versions, but Nike has, of course, patented various aspects already.

Shoe Screenshot of the Nike site. No rights claimed on it. That is a crazy looking shoe.

Runner's World has done a run-down on the Vaporfly shoes. The Nike shoes are lighter than others in the test whilst returning significantly more energy. A friend who runs a lot has concerns that there could be chance of injury for athletes who may lack the strength and control to adapt to this sort of performance.

A Guardian writer tried the Vaporfly on a parkrun and knocked almost a minute off her personal best. It is going to be very tempting for amateurs to try to do the same , but it has a cost with the shoes costing considerably more than others (around $250 for some types) whilst wearing out in less time. Even at that price it may seem a bargain compared with what people spend on racing bikes. With my own running I am just trying to improve on what I have done before. Mind you, my latest shoes ( On Cloudflow ) were a lot lighter than those I used before and may have helped me go quicker, but I still want to improve and will not rely on finding better shoes for each further gain. I believe I can gain more than the few percent any shoes may promise through better training.

Alternatives for the Nikes are already appearing with new Brooks shoes having some similar technology in the same price bracket and are also not very durable. The design looks more conventional than the Nike.

Having running shoes that wear out after less than 200 miles has a significant environmental impact. I think most amateur runners should expect to get several times that. Some manufacturers are catering for those who want to reduce waste by using recycled materials and plant-based soles . I will look into those when I am next buying.

The sports shoe industry is massive. I was looking at the Runner's World new releases and there are dozens of new models. There are lots of different types of shoe for road running, trails, track or just casual wear, but even so each manufacturer can have a vast range on offer. There were some I had not heard of that are silly prices, but I think they are more about fashion than practicality. It looks like Nike have hundreds of different shoes (90 just for running). I know there is a whole culture of collectors that they are happy to feed. I am less worried about fashion. I have taken to using old running shoes for casual wear.

Is anyone planning to get some of these Nike shoes? Do you feel you need them to be competitive? There could be a bit of an 'arms race' in shoe technology, but there have to be limits on how much improvement anyone can get just from their shoes. It could get like Formula 1 where some rules are designed to slow the cars down and make the racing more competitive.

Run free!

5.398 HBD







Thankfully I can't afford a pair right now, otherwise I'd be tempted.

Maybe if Bitcoin hits $50K I'll treat myself.

May as well pay for one environmental disaster with another!


According to the Bible, How do you influence faith to Christian believers? (Part 3 of 3)

(Sorry for sending this comment. We are not looking for our self profit, our intentions is to preach the words of God in any means possible.) Comment what you understand of our Youtube Video to receive our full votes. We have 30,000 #SteemPower. It's our little way to Thank you, our beloved friend.
Check our Discord Chat Join our Official Community:


I think it's neat. Maybe they should define acceptable shoes better before it is too late. Good point about bikes. Running is already the cheapest sport to practice. There something about speed skates with blades that hinged a few years back. This seems similar. Maybe they could have a shoeless version of events.


Hi, @steevc!

You just got a 5.65% upvote from SteemPlus! To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn. If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.


The last time i got involved with some shoes Nike made that is meant to improve the running experience I hated it.

While they don't cost that much now at the time they were over $100 and the separations on the bottom are supposed to improve sole flexibility. The problem, which i should have seen coming, is that anything on the road gets trapped inside these breaks and also the shoe friggin fell apart.

I'll stick with my tried and true New Balance cross trainers!


Should I let @bingbabe read this? She's already got a wardrobe of running shoes.. and that's not enough!


I don’t think it’s fair really to have a trainers that can help you run faster. Where is the fun on that? Running is about enjoying but yet competitive.

Running is a kind of sport to be enjoyed but not to be expensive. What is the point of having an expensive trainers if you don’t have the endurance and stamina. You have to have the physical and mental strength, you don’t need expensive trainers. Btw, I still do love my Asics Nimbus 20 they are awesome!!


I used to complain all the time about how expensive shoes are. When you see a post like this and you read about all of the time and technology that has went into the manufacture of them, it starts to make more sense why they cost so much. I personally can't see the day I spend more than $50 on a pair of shoes, but they do look pretty cool.


I am full on Altra anymore. It is a major pain in the ass that my running shoes all cost the same as my climbing shoes and wear out WAY faster. The carbon fiber plates are likely going to be in many shoes in the next couple of years but they may also get banned from racing. There is a heated discussion going on about the shoe tech and racing currently and I am sure there will be some stringent rules coming to sanctioned races.

Now if I could just get my ass out running again I would be good...